1905 and 1929
I've noticed that since I started tracking my reading in 2006, I've read books first published (in original language) in every twentieth century year except these two.
It's possible I have read books from these years, but before I began keeping a record.
Anyone have any recommendations? I suppose the obvious place to start is one of the top ones on this list. Thoughts? There doesn't seem to be a similar page for 1905.
It's possible I have read books from these years, but before I began keeping a record.
Anyone have any recommendations? I suppose the obvious place to start is one of the top ones on this list. Thoughts? There doesn't seem to be a similar page for 1905.
fine words butter no parsnips
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 7963
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 4:53 pm
- antispam: no
- Location: this hill-shadowed city/of razors and knives.
- Contact:
You've never read an Agatha Christie? They're an institution.
I've enjoyed the Dashiel Hammett books - beginning of a genre.
You're a bit spoilt for choice for 1929 - there's Wodehouse in there, and Grahame Greene.
May not all be as highbrow as your usual choices, though.
1905 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1905_in_literature
Jules Verne, HG Wells, some Sherlock Holmes.
I've enjoyed the Dashiel Hammett books - beginning of a genre.
You're a bit spoilt for choice for 1929 - there's Wodehouse in there, and Grahame Greene.
May not all be as highbrow as your usual choices, though.
1905 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1905_in_literature
Jules Verne, HG Wells, some Sherlock Holmes.
Rosencrantz: What are you playing at? Guildenstern: Words. Words. They're all we have to go on.
___________________________
Antiphon - www.antiphon.org.uk
___________________________
Antiphon - www.antiphon.org.uk
No, but I will. I have read the odd mystery and enjoyed it. Dorothy L. Sayers. We have loads of Christies floating around, my wife likes them.Ros wrote:You've never read an Agatha Christie? They're an institution.
Indeed and I'm suprised it was so early! I thought that stuff only really got going in the 40's... Shows what I know about genre fiction!I've enjoyed the Dashiel Hammett books - beginning of a genre.
Never heard of "The Man Within" though, looks a bit dodgy. However I notice there is a book by Henry Green who I'm a big fan of.You're a bit spoilt for choice for 1929 - there's Wodehouse in there, and Grahame Greene.
What are you talking about, Ros. I read "Pride and Prejudice" recently, which I think you'll agree is pretty gosh-darned middlebrow!May not all be as highbrow as your usual choices, though.
Actually I read "The House of Mirth" when I was a student, but since I wasn't tracking my reading then I'm not sure it counts.
fine words butter no parsnips
I've just been having a tour around my bookshelves and, annoyingly, the likely candidates seem to skirt around those years.
The first English translation of Herman Hesse's Steppenwolf was in 1929 (although it was actually written in '27) does that count?
The first English translation of Herman Hesse's Steppenwolf was in 1929 (although it was actually written in '27) does that count?
Thanks Nash, 1905 especially seems lean. No, Steppenwolf would count for '27. I know you're a fan. I think I tried it when I was about 14 off my Dad's bookshelf which probably put me off. Don't remember anything about it though. Not too mystical is it?Nash wrote:I've just been having a tour around my bookshelves and, annoyingly, the likely candidates seem to skirt around those years.
The first English translation of Herman Hesse's Steppenwolf was in 1929 (although it was actually written in '27) does that count?
Just noticed "Death of a Hero" by Richard Aldington in the '29 list which I've been meaning to get hold of for a while.
fine words butter no parsnips
The Sound and the Fury, surely? Hard going at first, I thought, but finally - yes, really - a masterpiece.
The only 1905 ones I've read - apart from Sherlock - are House of Mirth and Where Angels Fear to Tread (I had a Forster phase), although I feel I ought to read Kipps.
The only 1905 ones I've read - apart from Sherlock - are House of Mirth and Where Angels Fear to Tread (I had a Forster phase), although I feel I ought to read Kipps.
Fantastic! Another one I've heard great stuff about. Yet really have no idea what to expect.Antcliff wrote:I thought John Cooper Powys might be a good bet for a 1929...and he is. Wolf Solent.
fine words butter no parsnips
How is Where Angels FTT, any good? I loved Howard's End, not so fond of A Room with a View.David wrote:The Sound and the Fury, surely? Hard going at first, I thought, but finally - yes, really - a masterpiece.
The only 1905 ones I've read - apart from Sherlock - are House of Mirth and Where Angels Fear to Tread (I had a Forster phase), although I feel I ought to read Kipps.
Don't know anything about Kipps. Wells can be very good or awful...
As for Faulkner, it's just a yawning gulf in my reading. I read As I Lay Dying as a student, didn't really like it, though I suspect I would now.
fine words butter no parsnips
-
- Perspicacious Poster
- Posts: 7482
- Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2008 10:23 am
I've just finished reading As I Lay Dying. I loved it, but then I like Faulkner's writing. He surprises you in a slow draw kind of way. Light In August is one of my favourite novels. Graham Greene I've grown to like recently too. I used to carry a copy of Steppenwolf around in my back pocket when I was an impressionable teenager. I read it again a couple of years and just thought how vacuous it was.
I'm out of faith and in my cups
I contemplate such bitter stuff.
I contemplate such bitter stuff.
You surprise me, Ray! I would have thought a novel about a middle aged curmudgeon would have been right up your alley.ray miller wrote: I used to carry a copy of Steppenwolf around in my back pocket when I was an impressionable teenager. I read it again a couple of years and just thought how vacuous it was.
-
- Perspicacious Poster
- Posts: 7482
- Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2008 10:23 am
Ouch! But I think the middle aged years have gone now, mate.Nash wrote:You surprise me, Ray! I would have thought a novel about a middle aged curmudgeon would have been right up your alley.ray miller wrote: I used to carry a copy of Steppenwolf around in my back pocket when I was an impressionable teenager. I read it again a couple of years and just thought how vacuous it was.
I'm out of faith and in my cups
I contemplate such bitter stuff.
I contemplate such bitter stuff.