Page 1 of 1
Nightwatch
Posted: Tue May 16, 2017 11:42 am
by Crayon
Nightwatch
Friday's full moon spills
over into hard gardens
and lays upon dark yards
a wasted light by which
foxes fuck and good dogs
learn not to pine out loud.
Re: Nightwatch
Posted: Tue May 16, 2017 12:23 pm
by NotQuiteSure
[tab][/tab]
Good start, but where's the rest of it?
It reads like the beginning of a much longer piece.
I'd challenge 'wasted' given the line that follows it.
Regards, Not.
Re: Nightwatch
Posted: Tue May 16, 2017 12:35 pm
by Antcliff
Good start, but where's the rest of it?
Well, I am rather with Not, Crayon.
Feels like The Monster is about to walk into the scene. Let it?
seth
Re: Nightwatch
Posted: Sat May 27, 2017 1:08 am
by ton321
Hi, i liked it but as it has been mentioned, it seems like it the start of something longer. There is something heavy handed about the adjectives, if i may say ie
FULL moon, HARD gardens, DARK yards, WASTED light, promising though-
Tony
Re: Nightwatch
Posted: Sun May 28, 2017 7:13 pm
by bjondon
Hi Crayon,
- a nice coiled spring of a sentence . . . somewhere between Dylan Thomas and Raymond Chandler(?) . . . and yes it does whet the appetite for more. The hard serviceable adjectives work fine for me, a perfect setting for that fox-fuck diamond. The last line feels a bit loose though.
Julian
Re: Nightwatch
Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2017 8:53 pm
by Sheila
A wasted moon? This poem brings you down to Earth,(pardon the pun,) but this is what it's meant to do. We have more than enough poetry praising the moon, sometimes beauty is unappreciated, but it's still there . Beauty, just is, to me that is the whole point, and I feel it 's a point well made, there is no need for more. Sheila
Re: Nightwatch
Posted: Wed Jun 07, 2017 10:13 am
by ray miller
I quite like it as it is, though I don't think you need "over" and "into" in line 2, and "on" would suffice in line 3 rather than "upon".