Her eyes flash revolution
at the first shot fired,
the struggle re-defined.
Her strategies sprawl
outside the standard lines,
in variations of the absurd.
She speaks in tones,
a desert sound,
chimes, Japanese gongs.
Her thought vibrates comfortably,
full risk, at far reaches,
with unheard of solutions.
She challenges
the shifting center,
eases barricades to the wings
with a director's mastery
and indifference
to the beauty of her voice.
She's termagant,
a cyclone
in a box canyon.
At the over-leaping brilliance
of her gaze, the horizon
opens to her report.
(original)
Her eyes flash revolution
at the first shot fired,
the march home free.
She looks for possibilities
outside the standard lines,
in variations of the absurd.
The language she's chosen
is a tone, a desert sound,
chimes, Japanese gongs.
Her thought vibrates comfortably,
hauling in unheard of solutions
in far reaches, at full risk.
She gets off on changes
inside the shifting center,
eases barricades to the wings
with a performing clown's
nonchalance and wry indifference
to the beauty of her voice.
She's rambunctious,
stirring things up, like a zephyr
in a box canyon.
At the over-leaping brilliance
of her gaze, the horizon
opens to her report.
Lady from Madrid (revision)
- JJWilliamson
- Perspicacious Poster
- Posts: 3276
- Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2015 6:20 am
Hi RC
I love the title and am intrigued by this lady from Madrid, so much so that it merits a second and third read.
I will come back later to offer you some feedback, but in the meantime I'll just say I enjoyed this very much.
It had a enigmatic feel, or rather she did, that I found captivating.
Best
JJ
I love the title and am intrigued by this lady from Madrid, so much so that it merits a second and third read.
I will come back later to offer you some feedback, but in the meantime I'll just say I enjoyed this very much.
It had a enigmatic feel, or rather she did, that I found captivating.
Best
JJ
Long time a child and still a child
Hello RC,
they are coming thick and fast.
allows ambiguity in.
bland word choices let you down. 'looks for'
'possibilities', 'outside'...etc. They lack punch.
is flat, 'language' is weak and the perfect tense
also lessens the impact.
feels like you haven't quite hit the spot,
'hauling' seems inaccurate. 'in' and 'at'
are confusing and awkward.
of the clown image. 'Wry' doesn't quite fit
with portrait you've been building.
As does 'zephyr' with its implied gentleness
yet paired with 'stirring things up'.
Your close, however, hits the spot.
Seems like I've not much liked this when, in fact,
I really like what you are trying to do.
It's just some of your word choices and syntax which
are bogging this down.
Regards
they are coming thick and fast.
A strong start weakened by that last line thatHer eyes flash revolution
at the first shot fired,
the march home free.
allows ambiguity in.
While the idea here is good, the structure of the sentence andShe looks for possibilities
outside the standard lines,
in variations of the absurd.
bland word choices let you down. 'looks for'
'possibilities', 'outside'...etc. They lack punch.
This is better especially L3 but again the openingThe language she's chosen
is a tone, a desert sound,
chimes, Japanese gongs.
is flat, 'language' is weak and the perfect tense
also lessens the impact.
Again, the ideas a re sound but itHer thought vibrates comfortably,
hauling in unheard of solutions
in far reaches, at full risk.
feels like you haven't quite hit the spot,
'hauling' seems inaccurate. 'in' and 'at'
are confusing and awkward.
'Gets off' strikes the wrong tone as does the introductionShe gets off on changes
inside the shifting center,
eases barricades to the wings
with a performing clown's
nonchalance and wry indifference
to the beauty of her voice.
of the clown image. 'Wry' doesn't quite fit
with portrait you've been building.
Again, 'rambunctious' feels misplaced.She's rambunctious,
stirring things up, like a zephyr
in a box canyon.
At the over-leaping brilliance
of her gaze, the horizon
opens to her report.
As does 'zephyr' with its implied gentleness
yet paired with 'stirring things up'.
Your close, however, hits the spot.
Seems like I've not much liked this when, in fact,
I really like what you are trying to do.
It's just some of your word choices and syntax which
are bogging this down.
Regards
RC this is the same poem I've read from poetrycircle. Interesting that you are here too.