Page 1 of 1

Surveillance

Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2016 12:04 pm
by ray miller
Every nurse had a favourite kind of patient
and mine was neurotic middle-aged women,
who needed no prompting to pour out their problems
of drink and drugs and dead-eyed marriage.
What I most dreaded were the eggheads, the boffins
engaged in research on behalf of the government;
cloaked in secrecy, imagined to be
the listeners in, the state’s ears and eyes,
whose gig was about to be privatised
and re-branded with a name
that began and ended with a Q.
That’s what outsourcing can do for you.
There was always one to take up a bed,
sometimes they’d overlap, beat a path to our door
with anxiety states, panic attacks, a prelude
to meltdown and cataract, couldn’t look
at you straight, always minding their back,
such a weight on their shoulders they yearned
to unpack, then they’d pull down shutters
and cite the Official Secrets Act.
It was always like that, typical was Bruce,
stressed he might lose the job that he hated
and the consequent financial crisis;
locked out of the marriage bed, a child
diagnosed with Asperger’s and the noise
of torture from the upstairs flat, a piano’s drone,
the screech of a cat, a popping balloon
which hunted him down from room to room.
His redacted face would glisten with sweat
and grow lichen-dark; an ear would cock
and tune itself in to the boos and hisses
emanating from lights and electric switches.
At work he’d crawl into hiding places,
beneath a desk or bench, around a toilet seat,
then curl into a foetal state, unmeasured
and untargeted, no more accountable than an ape.
Bruce never saw the funny side
that those entrusted with state security
couldn’t manage to locate their own employee.
No sense of humour, no joie de vivre,
and none of them ever spoke to each other,
just a glance, a nod as they queued for meds
and they always kept their heads bowed down
before the camera at the top of the stairs.
If we happened to catch them unawares,
they’d be writing down stuff and none of us
liked to look what was written,
we imagined that it was just a symptom
of an obsessive compulsive disorder.
We should’ve known better.
I only put two and two together
when a manager from the local Trust
presented us with a lengthy report
which stated that we weren’t robust enough;
an inefficient waste of resources,
and in the current climate, blah, blah, market forces,
our existence could no longer be supported.
Our caseloads and our premises
would be taken by the Home Treatment team.
Then I recalled, for the first time in ever so long,
the boffins had all recovered and gone.
When Home Treatment prepared to pay them visits
they found the addresses they’d given fictitious.

Re: Surveillance

Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2016 11:45 am
by B00295798
This is really sweet!!! I wasn't too sure of it at the beginning as i'm not a major fan of rhyming.... I think it's clever and subtle, the rhymes give it a nice swing instead of a steady pace. I think it could benefit from a few more powerful, striking words - maybe some dramatic punctuation or clever spacing to make the end of the sentances hang - this could give the story a bit more space and time to settle into the mind of the reader. It's a great linear piece and I really liked it :)

Re: Surveillance

Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2016 2:14 pm
by Macavity
Vivid write Ray, the rhythm and rhyme kept the pictures flowing. redacted face is a haunting image. The system proving merciless to its own bureaucrats a concluding irony. Not sure if you need some of those 'then' .

cheers

mac

Re: Surveillance

Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2016 2:20 pm
by steamboats
I think it's a great story too and, in spite of the rhymes and some lines being quite rhythmical, I feel it would work better and have more impact, as a prose piece

Re: Surveillance

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2016 10:32 am
by ray miller
Thanks for the comments. To be honest, I don't like it very much at all - there's rhyme and rhythm but the telling is shoddy and too long.

Re: Surveillance

Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2016 10:56 am
by David
You're tough on yourself, Ray, but I think you're right about this one. It doesn't engage my enthusiasm or interest in the way that your poems so often do. There are great individual passages, of course, but they're not sustained for the whole poem.

You might find a much better poem in this yet.

Cheers

David

Re: Surveillance

Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2016 10:59 am
by Antcliff
A poem in there for sure.

Interesting. Do you tend to write long and then cut down?

Seth

Re: Surveillance

Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2016 12:30 pm
by ray miller
David wrote:You're tough on yourself, Ray, but I think you're right about this one. It doesn't engage my enthusiasm or interest in the way that your poems so often do. There are great individual passages, of course, but they're not sustained for the whole poem.

You might find a much better poem in this yet.

Cheers

David
Thanks, David. That's just about how I feel about it.

Re: Surveillance

Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2016 12:39 pm
by ray miller
Antcliff wrote:A poem in there for sure.

Interesting. Do you tend to write long and then cut down?

Seth
Not really. You know how some couples work their way methodically, page by page, through the Kama Sutra, well, my missus and I tried that, but the visits to A and E proved costly and embarrassing. Still, I decided to adopt the same kind of approach to writing poetry, take a modern anthology and poem by poem be guided, more or less, by the form( or formlessness). What often emerges is a million miles from what started it off. Much like the Kama Sutra, in fact.