Flightless Birds.

This is a serious poetry forum not a "love-in". Post here for more detailed, constructive criticism.
Post Reply
User avatar
barrie
Perspicacious Poster
Perspicacious Poster
Posts: 6069
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 1:13 am
Location: lake district

Mon Jan 02, 2006 1:25 pm

Picking through the remains of his life,
and other people's thrown away
take-aways,
the old man in three coats, string tied,
made a find.
Fumbling with a newspaper,
he fashioned a parcel for his pocket,
and stumbled, happlily mumbling,
onto the chaos of the pavement.
A stubbled smile was a greeting
that most folk avoided, like bodily contact
or eye impact.
Fear of contagion bent their paths,
skewed their eyes.
When he'd passed,
they shook the sand out of their hair,
along with their ostrich mentality.

Just for now.
Last edited by barrie on Wed Jan 04, 2006 12:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
ki no sei

Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:38 pm

I think it would read better as 'bodily impact...eye contact..'

I like the 'just for now', it has a certain optimistic tone for the tramp.
User avatar
barrie
Perspicacious Poster
Perspicacious Poster
Posts: 6069
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 1:13 am
Location: lake district

Tue Jan 03, 2006 9:04 pm

Eye contact sounded too much of a cliche, so I swapped them around. After all, not much bodily impact occurs on the street, except on Friday and Saturday night.

I take your point all the same.

cheers
Bombadil
Perspicacious Poster
Perspicacious Poster
Posts: 2672
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 6:38 pm
Location: The hills are my home, the mountains where I roam.
Contact:

Tue Jan 03, 2006 9:26 pm

I like bodily contact better.

People are less loath to look at a bum than hug one.



Me likey.
User avatar
twoleftfeet
Perspicacious Poster
Perspicacious Poster
Posts: 6761
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2005 4:02 pm
Location: Standing by a short pier, looking for a long run-up

Wed Jan 04, 2006 10:07 am

I don't know the technical terminology, but I would have enjoyed reading this poem for its rhythm and sound alone.
I especially like
"the old man in three coats, string tied,
made a find"
"he fashioned a parcel for his pocket"
"stumbled, happlily mumbling"

"Bodily contact , Eye impact" ,for me, works perfectly.

"Contamination" somehow disrupts the rhythm that has been created
(too many syllables?).
I can't think of a decent alternative - perhaps "exposure"?

Great stuff, all the same

Cheers
Geoff
User avatar
barrie
Perspicacious Poster
Perspicacious Poster
Posts: 6069
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 1:13 am
Location: lake district

Wed Jan 04, 2006 12:57 pm

I think you're right. I got out the thesaurus and happened upon 'ordure', a word I have never come across - dung, or anything unclean, it means. But I opted for 'contagion' in the end, I'm not sure about 'ordure'.

Thanks for noticing that.

cheers
Ewan_McTeagle
Posts: 41
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 2:35 am
Location: Poland

Wed Jan 04, 2006 4:35 pm

for me it starts here:

"Fumbling with a newspaper,
he fashioned a parcel for his pocket,
and stumbled, happlily mumbling,
onto the chaos of the pavement.
A stubbled smile was a greeting
that most folk avoided, like bodily contact
or eye impact.
Fear of contagion bent their paths,
skewed their eyes.
When he'd passed,
they shook the sand out of their hair,
along with their ostrich mentality. "



the intro is unnecessary in my opinion.

As twoleftfeet have noticed the rhythm and the sound of the words is so good that it could easily be a simple twaddle and I would still like it.
Very good piece.

Thanx for the read
Kpt Quack
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 12:21 am

Thu Jan 05, 2006 11:25 am

I think it needs the start, as without it you lose the setting and feel for the rest of the poem. The whole forlorn feeling i got would be lost in this *edited* version.

Eye impact I feel is the weakest point of the poem. It flowed very well and your use of words and imagery is very good. However, it made me stop and think, which I feel is not the intention of the line. Eye contact is not a cliché, it's a statement of fact of an event. You do not have change statements that are made in common language. As the statement 'eye contact' sums up far more imagery and insight than eye impact!

on the whole, thank you, I think it is a very good piece.
User avatar
barrie
Perspicacious Poster
Perspicacious Poster
Posts: 6069
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 1:13 am
Location: lake district

Thu Jan 05, 2006 12:09 pm

Thanks for all your opinions and comments, they'll be kept in mind for future reference.

Question; does 'eye impact' not bring across the recoil that most people seem to experience when they make eye contact with a tramp?

just a thought

cheers all
Post Reply