Perhaps 2/3 poems a week limit on posting? Otherwise new posters may be tempted to honour us with their back catalogue:
http://www.poemhunter.com/mike-acker/poems/
Just a suggestion
mac
Spam
-
- Perspicacious Poster
- Posts: 6599
- Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 1:35 am
- Location: At the end of stanza 3
I see. This would rather explain your lack of critting, Mike. Too busy pressing the "upload" button at Poem Hunter. The game is up, Moriarty.
Seth
Seth
We fray into the future, rarely wrought
Save in the tapestries of afterthought.
Richard Wilbur
Save in the tapestries of afterthought.
Richard Wilbur
-
- Persistent Poster
- Posts: 247
- Joined: Sun May 04, 2014 1:50 am
Actually, I've been "honoring" the group with my back catalogue, but only because I decided I wanted to start publishing after a lifetime of putting my poems in a trunk. Is that something I shouldn't be doing? My back catalogue isn't terribly extensive.
I have no objection to new members posting older poems that we haven't seen before. The rewriting of poems is never done, and fresh opinions can always nudge you in a new, fruitful direction. Got to get that posting / critting proportion right, though. Can't just swamp us with them.
I have no objection to long-time members posting older poems that we have seen before, either, if they think that would be helpful. Within limits, of course.
I have no objection to long-time members posting older poems that we have seen before, either, if they think that would be helpful. Within limits, of course.
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 7963
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 4:53 pm
- antispam: no
- Location: this hill-shadowed city/of razors and knives.
- Contact:
Seconded. We don't count religiously; it's just a matter of whether people seem to be engaging with the whole process, or taking advantage.David wrote:I have no objection to new members posting older poems that we haven't seen before. The rewriting of poems is never done, and fresh opinions can always nudge you in a new, fruitful direction. Got to get that posting / critting proportion right, though. Can't just swamp us with them.
I have no objection to long-time members posting older poems that we have seen before, either, if they think that would be helpful. Within limits, of course.
Ros
Rosencrantz: What are you playing at? Guildenstern: Words. Words. They're all we have to go on.
___________________________
Antiphon - www.antiphon.org.uk
___________________________
Antiphon - www.antiphon.org.uk
-
- Persistent Poster
- Posts: 247
- Joined: Sun May 04, 2014 1:50 am
You may not care for my formalist and somewhat dated writing style, but I think you'll agree that I'm engaged.
I'm not one of those people who can hear a bird chirping from a bush and then write a poem about it. All my poems are about deep, personal issues, so I haven't written a huge number of them.
I'm presented with a problem, however. There is such a distaste for my style of writing here that I don't think the good elements of my poems get much recognition. I have a few poems that I would like to post, but I'm hesitating because I know no one will like the style.
I'm not one of those people who can hear a bird chirping from a bush and then write a poem about it. All my poems are about deep, personal issues, so I haven't written a huge number of them.
I'm presented with a problem, however. There is such a distaste for my style of writing here that I don't think the good elements of my poems get much recognition. I have a few poems that I would like to post, but I'm hesitating because I know no one will like the style.
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 7963
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 4:53 pm
- antispam: no
- Location: this hill-shadowed city/of razors and knives.
- Contact:
People here crit to the best of their ability, and generally are very encouraging. No board is going to suit everyone; there's less of a formalist tradition at present in the UK (where most, but by no means all, of our members are based). We're happy with metrical, though; David is nearly always metrical, for e.g. I believe we can recognise good craft, but of course personal tastes differ. It's up to you whether you want to post here or find somewhere more in tune with what you do. Subjective or not, people will say what they think. It's a matter of whether that's of any use to you.CalebMurdock wrote:You may not care for my formalist and somewhat dated writing style, but I think you'll agree that I'm engaged.
I'm not one of those people who can hear a bird chirping from a bush and then write a poem about it. All my poems are about deep, personal issues, so I haven't written a huge number of them.
I'm presented with a problem, however. There is such a distaste for my style of writing here that I don't think the good elements of my poems get much recognition. I have a few poems that I would like to post, but I'm hesitating because I know no one will like the style.
Ros
Rosencrantz: What are you playing at? Guildenstern: Words. Words. They're all we have to go on.
___________________________
Antiphon - www.antiphon.org.uk
___________________________
Antiphon - www.antiphon.org.uk
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 7963
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 4:53 pm
- antispam: no
- Location: this hill-shadowed city/of razors and knives.
- Contact:
Apparently, neither am ICalebMurdock wrote:
I'm not one of those people who can hear a bird chirping from a bush and then write a poem about it. .
Ros
Rosencrantz: What are you playing at? Guildenstern: Words. Words. They're all we have to go on.
___________________________
Antiphon - www.antiphon.org.uk
___________________________
Antiphon - www.antiphon.org.uk
-
- Perspicacious Poster
- Posts: 5375
- Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 7:35 am
- antispam: no
- Location: Japan
- Contact:
Post of the week anyone?Ros wrote:Apparently, neither am ICalebMurdock wrote:
I'm not one of those people who can hear a bird chirping from a bush and then write a poem about it. .
Ros
B.